
Search for companies, drugs, and catalysts
Search for companies, drugs, and catalysts
Past performance is not indicative of future results. These predictions are for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Always conduct your own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Live results from our current, leakage-controlled models (features strictly pre-event; validated out-of-sample at ~0.68 AUC). We restarted the public record on May 31, 2026 so every figure here reflects only the models running today — it fills in as upcoming catalysts resolve.
Last updated: 7/4/2026 | Period: Since relaunch
~80% of catalyst moves are neutral, so a model only adds value if it beats the “always-neutral” guess. We show this so the headline can't flatter itself.
impact_pdufaimpact_trialimpact_otherEach category uses a specialized model trained on its catalyst type. Categories fill in as their catalysts resolve; ones with nothing resolved yet show “No data yet” rather than a 0% that would read as failure. Every figure is measured against the same actual market outcomes.
If the signal carries an edge, higher-conviction calls hit more often.
For reference, 3-way direction accuracy is 6.7% — but direction isn't the model's objective (it forecasts run-up conviction and almost always expects a positive run-up), so the hit-rate and conviction lift above are the meaningful measures.
Graded against: SEC EDGAR 424B filings (priced offerings), resolved ~95 days after each event. Model: calibrated XGBoost on cash runway, filing cadence (time since last raise, active shelf), recent run-up and market cap — holdout AUC ~0.65. An offering is not always negative (it extends the runway); the exact timing within the window is not predictable.
Model Performance Varies by Catalyst Type
Our ML model performs best on PDUFA events (FDA decisions) where historical patterns are more predictable. Phase 2/3 clinical trial predictions have limited accuracy due to binary outcomes and market efficiency. We are actively working to improve non-PDUFA predictions.
Up | Down | Neutral | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Predicted Up | 4 | 4 | 12 |
| Predicted Down | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Predicted Neutral | 1 | 4 | 33 |
Diagonal values (highlighted) represent correct predictions
| Week | Predictions | Accurate | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6/22/2026 | 8 | 3 | 37.5% |
| 6/15/2026 | 25 | 13 | 52.0% |
| 6/8/2026 | 3 | 3 | 100.0% |
| 6/1/2026 | 16 | 11 | 68.8% |
| 5/25/2026 | 10 | 7 | 70.0% |
| 5/18/2026 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% |
| 5/11/2026 | 1 | 1 | 100.0% |
This track record shows actual predictions made by our ML model on historical biotech catalyst events. Each prediction is compared against the real market outcome to measure accuracy.
Predictions include price direction (up/down/neutral) and expected return percentage. The same ML models power our Entry Timing and Opportunities features.
The metrics you see on the Catalyst Entry Analysis page are powered by the same ML models validated here. The Hist. positive rate corresponds to our Direction Accuracy, while theAvg. historical move corresponds to our Return Accuracy. This track record provides transparency into how well those models have performed historically.